FREE ESSAY ON THE EFFECTS OF THE RUSSO-JAPANESE WAR ON WW1

THE EFFECTS OF THE RUSSO-JAPANESE WAR ON WW1

a minute to approximately three and hurt his ability to defend himself while he loaded the
awkward device. The shortcomings associated with these muzzleloaders were, in a large
part, responsible for the style of battlefield tactics of the day.
Smokeless gunpowder was the next major advancement to affect gun development. Smokeless
gunpowder led to the development of cartridge bullets. These bullets enabled the lead
shot to be pre-packaged with the gunpowder and dramatically shortened the time involved
with reloading. Additionally, the cartridge bullets were more streamlined than their
predecessors and allowed the opportunity to pack more gunpowder with each shot. This
additional gunpowder provided greater accuracy over longer distances than would have been
imaginable during the time of Napoleon. Without the development of cartridge bullets, the
Winchester repeating rifle would not have been possible. The use of smokeless gunpowder
would also enable the artillery to move from cannon balls to shells.
During all the pre-modern wars, the style of battle was fairly simple on the surface. The
aggressor army would position itself to attack its opponent. Once the aggressor had both
its artillery and archery units in place, it would open fire on the enemy. This
bombardment would continue until the leaders felt that they had sufficiently softened up
their opponent's line of defense. At this point the enemy would be attacked on foot by
the infantry. During the attack, it was essential for the infantrymen stay in their ranks
and maintain the line. The line consisted of three rows of infantrymen. A weak spot in
the lines would lower the concentration of fire that the opponent received. 
Once the line reached the appropriate range, they would open fire. The front line would
fire their weapons and kept the fire going while the other two lines reloaded. After the
front line had fired, it would shift to the back. The line behind them would then step
forward and fire. This was done in fairly quick progression as aiming was at a minimum
for the infantryman. They simply lifted their gun high enough to hit the other line and
fired. This would continue as long as necessary to weaken the enemy to the point of
bayonet charge. The bayonet charge would finish off the enemy as it usually scattered
their forces off the field.
This methodical technique was clearly developed to allow time for the infantrymen to
re-load their slow, awkward weapons. These low speed guns made this type of battle
appropriate. The introduction of the Winchester repeating rifle signaled the beginning of
the end to the effectiveness of this style of warfare. The Winchester repeaters got one
of their first combat experiences during the Russo-Turkish War of 1877. 
The Turks were greatly outnumbered when the Russians attacked the town of Plevna. The
battle started in July of 1877 when the Russians attacked. The Turks, who were encamped
with their American made Winchester Repeating rifles, stood their ground against the far
superior Russians. The Turks cut down over eight thousand of the Russians in the first
major battle. The siege of the town went on for nearly six months, and was not over until
the Turkish commander gave up because they were not getting re-supplied . The repeating
rifles proved though that traditional warfare would not continue to work. A much larger
army, which in Napoleon's day was believed necessary to win, had essentially failed.
These weapons were advanced even farther to become more accurate, stronger and generally
easier to use and load. This is much the reason that the Gatling gun, the predecessor to
the machine gun, was invented. This was invented in 1862 during the American Civil War.
With the invention of brass cartridge Gatling felt he could make a gun that fired at a
high rate. He mounted ten barrels on a rotating piece, which as it was turned, loaded,
fired and unloaded the barrels automatically. The Gatling Gun was an advancement into a
new generation of warfare and just like the Winchester Repeating rifle had been created
too late for widespread use in the Civil War.
The principle difference between a machine gun and the Gatling gun was the way in which
the cartridge was loaded. In the Gatling gun, the rotating motion was responsible for
loading the gun. In a machine gun, the weapon is loaded by using the energy from the
recoil of the fired bullet. This was made possible by the previous invention of smokeless
powder. 
In 1885 Hiram Maxim invented the first real machine gun. The machine gun worked much
better than the Gatling gun because it did not require any effort to keep firing.
Additionally, the Gatling Gun was a larger, heavier and less maneuverable weapon than the
machine gun. The soldier would simply leave his finger on the trigger of the machine gun,
and the gun would keep firing. This would have great effect in the amount of lead that
could be fired back and forth in the "no man's land" that existed between the trenches
during World War 1.
One of the first examples of machine guns devastating effects when used in open field was
felt during the 1904 Russo-Japanese War. The Russians used Maxim guns during the entire
campaign, but commonly for defense of positions. The Japanese however, used their
Hotchkiss Guns, which were machine guns that were built on the same principle as the
Maxim, only with a few improvements for mobility. The Japanese moved six of these guns
into a position in which they could fire on the Russians on a hillside some 1,500 meters
away. In a short period, these six guns had overwhelmed the Russians and accounted for
over 1,000 casualties .
-One of Maxim's early designs 
Dupuy explains in his book how improvements in military tactics were not made as a result
of experiences with these new guns:
Both the South African War (1899-1902) and the Russo-Japanese 
War (1904-5) provided evidence regarding the battlefield efficacy 
of bolt action and clip fed rifles, entrenchments, and quick firing 
artillery. But these examples did not stir military thought to an 
adequate reappraisal of the presumed psychological and practical 
effectiveness of seizing the initiative and conducting mass attacks 
that would carry all before them. 
Artillery
During the Civil War, the principle piece of artillery used was the cannon ball. These
seemingly ancient weapons were used quite simply. Cannon balls were fired out of the
cannon with the intention of bouncing off the ground and plowing through the troops. This
made them very reliant on several factors. 
First, was the dryness of the ground. The drier the ground, the firmer the cannon ball
would bounce, and thus the greater force it would carry with it as it plowed into the
lines of the opposition. As shown at the Battle of Waterloo, the condition of the ground
and the ability to use cannon fire could greatly affect an armies chances of victory, as
it did Napoleon's army. Napoleon's army was one of the greatest ever at using its
artillery (probably in some part due to General Bonaparte being an artillery man himself)
and had won many battles due to their weakening of the other side during the pre-battle.
The wet turf found at Waterloo kept Napoleon from using his cannons as he would have
liked, and this inability to weaken the larger enemy was one of the major factors in his
loss.
Bibliography
none